Another mass
shooting that makes no sense. Except, this one might, if it turns out that the
shooter was actually motivated by hate. In the era of a black president, can
Americans still be motivated to kill each other based upon skin color? Apparently,
one can.
Some
previous shooters have had a greater link to mental illness. But is racism a
mental disease? Should it be? Certainly, the desire to kill someone because
they look different has no logical rationale. Certainly, there were
participants of past racial violence that shared the same fear, distrust, hate
as yesterday’s shooter. And certainly, no one of that era would have suggested
that they weren’t mentally ill, just good ol’ boys that went too far. Were they
mentally ill then?
With each
mass shooting (how depressing to acknowledge more than one and suggest their
regular occurrence), calls for a more universally armed public are heard.
“If only someone had a gun,
he couldn’t have killed as many,” they’ll state with certainly. And, certainly,
there have been people, mostly law enforcement officers, who have stopped a
deadly encounter from expanding.
I believe that those on the
left must agree to the possibility that this could happen. If everyone were
armed, it would be very unlikely that one person could kill as many as they
often (there again, how awful to write the plural) do. But the right has to
agree that mass shootings would be replaced by many, many, smaller incidents of
gun violence as angry individual have immediate access to a deadly weapon.
Imagine every angry driver with the ability to express his anger with a gun and
not just the car.
Another depressing thought
about this terrible tragedy is the realization that there will be not solution
devised in time to prevent the next one. One side wants more guns in more hands
and the other side wants fewer guns in fewer hands. The other unanswered
question is how many more will die? The number is unknown but not that fact that it will be a number. A large one.
No comments:
Post a Comment