I’ve started
to play chess again. It had been years since I last played any serious games
and I’m making an effort to get back into playing form. I one point in time, I
was an active member in the US Chess Federation and actually attended several
tournaments. Though, those 12 year olds can be tough.
I am making
stupid, stupid mistakes. I’m playing mostly blitz chess to feed the habit,
which really doesn’t lend itself to proper study or practice. But I have noticed
some changes in my play.
Just as I’ve
lost a step or two to age, the same on the chessboard. I’ve lost several won
positions on time, just because I wasn’t processing the info as quick. And in
these quick games, the clock is part of the strategy. It can be used as a
weapon as much as a knight or a rook.
In other
games, luck can be a major or minor factor. From dice games that are almost all
luck to board games that encourage strategy, but still have a random element
such as drawing cards, most have a beginner’s luck factor in which even a
novice player can get lucky and beat an experienced player. Not so in chess.
When you
lose in chess, YOU lose in chess. Not the roll of the dice, not drawing bad
cards, and not some random factor that didn’t go your way. In chess, YOU make
the decisions and YOU move the pieces. When you get beat, the other player was
simply better than you. Period.
There are
different ways to lose, too. I mentioned losing on time. Sometimes it feels
like a cheap way to lose, “man, I HAD him, I just needed more time.” Well
sport, that IS the part of the game and you just got outplayed.
There are
silly, stupid beginner traps that can catch you. Most experienced players know
the opening ones by heart and do not fall for them. I’ve forgotten several and
I am now taking a refresher course at the expense of my ego. As you play more,
you recognize them being set-up and learn how to counteract them and put
yourself in a better position. When an opponent catches me with one, I feel
like I just took a hot sheet pan out of the oven with an oven mitt, took the
mitt off, and then touched the tray. IDIOT!
In the
endgame, when there are only kings, pawns, and a minor piece or two left on the
board, the player with a better grasp of endgame theory can often beat the
opponent with a material advantage but lessor endgame skill. That hurts too.
You look at the board and wonder how the fuck you lost. It’s like losing a
close scoring game, I’d rather get blown out than know one slightly better move
on my part and I could have won it.
But when you
win… What a great feeling. You BEAT him. Especially when they are higher ranked
than yourself. There is no bad bounce, no favorable call by the referee, just
out and out better playing on your part and you took them downtown! Maybe they
made a mistake or you made a brilliant sacrifice, in either case, for a moment
you were in one on one combat and came out on top. For a moment, you are top
dog. Then the next game comes and you lose your rook to a bishop pin you forgot
about and you’re right back to thinking a chimpanzee could beat you.
I’m off to seek
that euphoria of victory. I hope the chimps are asleep.
No comments:
Post a Comment